Blog
For more than a decade, I had been circling the same question from different angles:
Why does the way we work feel so broken?
I moved in and out of research, practice, leadership, collapse, rebuilding. I studied organizations as social systems. I studied humans as biological beings. Each step led to something that felt like a revelation — large, framing insights that rearranged how I understood purpose, work, force, and society.
But none of them prepared me for the moment when something deeper cracked me open.
It came when I finally saw that we are not independent actors navigating a neutral world. We are life itself — expressions of a single, living system. Not separate. Not sovereign. Interdependent.
In that moment, things I had struggled with for years began to make sense.
I began to see our feelings — so often treated as weaknesses to manage or distractions to overcome — differently.
Not as noise to suppress or signals to interpret, but as the felt movement of life itself.
They arise in the space between balance and imbalance, between resting and becoming. Not to instruct us, but to be the movement through change — within our bodies, across relationships, and through the living systems we participate in.
And at the same time, another realization landed with equal power: almost everything else is story.
Not in a dismissive way. Not as illusion or deception. But as something created.
Our thoughts. Our ideas. Our language. Our institutions. Our societies.
All is story — expressions of a symbolic capacity that evolved within life, allowing experience to be carried forward, futures to be imagined, and coordination to occur across time and space.
An extraordinary tool.
And still just a tool.
That day, when my life co-pilot Laura came home, she could see it in my face before I said anything. I told her what I had realized. She looked at me carefully and asked if I was okay.
I said no.
But I also said I would be.
It took months before that became true.
Because I had come to terms with the reality that I was not the master of everything that makes me me. And in that loss, I found something steadier: belonging.
Not alone, fighting to survive — but a wave of the ocean, moving in concert.
When we talk about story, we usually mean narrative — something we tell or believe. But story runs deeper than that. It’s the symbolic operating system through which much of modern human life is organized and interpreted.
Story shapes meaning.
How we see ourselves and the world.
Identity.
Belonging.
Morality.
Purpose.
Structure.
Power.
Through story, complexity is reduced and made navigable. Behavior is coordinated. Futures are anticipated. Patterns of order become legible.
Story allows millions of strangers to coordinate their behavior within a shared reality.
But the very thing that makes story powerful also makes it dangerous.
Because stories can harden.
They can become unquestionable.
They can turn from concepts into cages and ideologies into weapons.
And when that happens, we don’t notice — we normalize.
The essays in Part 3 were not separate inquiries. They were seven entry points into the same symbolic architecture.
Each asked a simple question.
Each exposed a deeper story.
What Is a Job?
The story of worth: Your value comes from your productivity.
What Is Governance?
The story of order: Rules keep us safe and organized.
What Is Ownership?
The story of security: What you have determines your power.
What Is Power?
The story of legitimacy: Leadership is control.
What Is the Individual?
The story of identity: You are separate. You must stand alone.
What Is System Thinking?
The story of understanding: The system can be solved if we map it well enough.
What Are Values?
The story of morality: There is a right way to live—follow it.
Each story reinforces the next.
Together, they form a closed loop.
This is the Story Lens — the symbolic world we inherited, learned to navigate, and learned to mistake for reality.
Story itself is not the problem.
It is one of life’s most powerful capacities — a way of representing patterns, sharing experience, and coordinating across time and scale.
But story doesn’t remain static.
As it evolves from thought to narrative, from narrative to artifact, from artifact to system, and from system to society, it can become increasingly abstracted from the living processes it once reflected.
In some cultural trajectories, people kept symbolic representations closely coupled to land, body, relationship, and consequence.
In others, people stabilized symbols, externalized meaning, and prioritized coherence over responsiveness.
Over time, we built our lives around story. As that became normal, story no longer merely reflects life — it begins to prioritize story over life.
That separation shows up everywhere.
Personally, experience narrows. Life begins to feel like pressure and performance. Belonging becomes conditional. Worth is measured externally. Exhaustion is normalized. Shame is internalized — not because story exists, but because the stories shaping identity have lost contact with lived balance and relationship.
Collectively, coordination hardens into hierarchy. Systems designed to support collaboration demand compliance. Differences are interpreted as threats rather than signals.
Planetarily, symbolic framings of life as resource dominate action. Growth is prioritized over balance. Extraction replaces reciprocity. The living world becomes inventory — not because story is present, but because the stories guiding action are no longer constrained by ecological consequence.
This is not the failure of story.
It is the consequence of story becoming separated from life.
For me, the story didn’t collapse all at once. It cracked.
It cracked when job titles stopped explaining what mattered.
When governance began to feel inhumane rather than protective.
When power created distance instead of capacity.
When individualism felt hollow instead of freeing.
When mapping systems didn’t resolve the pain inside them.
When values contradicted lived behavior.
Each crack revealed a gap between the story and life itself.
And through those gaps, something else was felt.
At the center of all this sits a simple distinction we rarely make.
Story is representation.
It is symbolic, not biological.
It is interpretive, not conditional.
An experiment, not a truth.
Life does not operate on coherence or certainty.
It operates through energy, adaptation, reproduction, relationship, reciprocity, and balance.
Stories organize meaning, identity, control, morality, and legitimacy.
Life responds.
The trouble begins when representation is treated as reality itself —
when symbolic descriptions are taken as conditions of life rather than references to them.
In those moments, it is not story that distorts life,
but our reliance on representation where responsiveness is required.
When representation is treated as reality, disagreement does not stay symbolic for long.
Stories are no longer held as interpretations, but as truths.
Differences in perspective harden into conflicts over what is.
Beliefs are defended as if life itself were at stake — because representation has been mistaken for reality.
Much of the fighting we see today unfolds through story. Through identities, ideologies, values, and systems that people organize themselves around and act as if they were reality itself.
At first, this conflict remains symbolic.
Language sharpens. Positions polarize. Meaning disconnects.
But over time, the cost is no longer contained within story.
Bodies carry the stress.
Relationships break.
Communities collapse.
Land is extracted.
Life absorbs the impact.
What begins as conflict at the level of representation
eventually becomes damage at the level of life.
This is the trap.
The map becomes the territory.
The job becomes the identity.
The leader becomes the owner.
The rules become morality.
The system becomes truth.
The story becomes “reality.”
At that point, questioning the story feels like threatening life itself.
But it isn’t.
It’s seeing it for the tool that it is.
So the question is not:
How do we fix the story?
There seems to be another question moving underneath these:
How do we return to life?
The shift is subtle — and radical.
From symbols to relationships.
From control to connection.
From identity to belonging.
From hierarchy to interdependence.
From values to conditions.
From story back to life.
This is the pivot into Part 4 of the Serving Life Series.
This is not an invitation to change the story.
It is an invitation to notice something more unsettling.
To step back far enough
to notice that story was never the ground.
Far enough to see that
thoughts,
ideas,
strategies,
rules,
systems,
and ideologies
are not reality.
To sense the difference between representation and life itself.
Life is waiting underneath the story.